An Endemic Spurge in Florida

A pistillate cyathium of a Telephus spurge.

Endemism fascinates me. Why some organisms occur in certain restrict areas geographically and nowhere else is such a fun topic to ponder. On a recent trip to the Florida Panhandle, I was lucky enough to encounter a wonderful little plant endemic to pine flatwoods located at the very tip of the Apalachicola region. It is a type of spurge known as Telephus spurge (Euphorbia telephioides) whose natural history is captivating to say the least.

The Telephus spurge is a denizen of dry, sandy soils. Its fleshy leaves and deep, tuberous taproot not only allow it to handle drought via the storage of water and nutrients, its root system also allows it to live a long time. Though it is hard to say how long individuals can actually live, lifetimes measured in decades are well within the realm of possibility. Like many members of the spurge family (Euphorbiaceae), the Telephus spurge is also well defended by toxic, milky sap.

A staminate cyathium of a Telephus spurge.

The inflorescence of the Telephus spurge is defined as a cyathium. Plants can produce multiple cyathia per plant, and for the Telephus spurge, these can contain only male, only female, or both reproductive structures. Sex of individual Telephus spurge is an interesting topic unto itself and very important when it comes to conservation (more on that in a bit). Individual Telephus spurge can be fluid in their sexual expression from one year to the next. Individuals that produced only male cyathia one year can go on to produce only female or bisexual cyathia in subsequent years. No one can say for sure what triggers these changes among individuals, but disturbance and energy reserves likely play a considerable role.

One of the most important aspects of Telephus spurge ecology is fire. Without regular fires, the entire habitat of the Telephus spurge would gradually close in with woody shrubs and trees and disappear. Even though most of the top parts of these plants are killed by fires, their large tuberous root system allows them to readily regrow what was lost. That is not to say that individuals regularly regrow after fires. In fact, plants have been known to disappear for years at a time following top killing events, only to resprout at some point in the future when favorable conditions return.

Telephus spurge fruits are quite pretty!

At this point, it should be obvious that for this species to persist, its habitat needs to be maintain via fire. Management for this species is very important given its narrow distribution and sporadic occurrence on the landscape. However, there are still many hurdles in the way of effective Telephus spurge conservation. For starters, though it once likely enjoyed a more contiguous distribution throughout the Apalachicola region, habitat destruction from logging, ditching, and development have highly fragmented its populations into tiny clusters. The smaller these clusters become, the more vulnerable they are to extirpation.

Another factor complicating the conservation of this species is its aforementioned sexual fluidity. Because we still don’t know what triggers a change in sexual expression among individuals from one year to the next, populations can fluctuate greatly in terms of their reproductive capacity. For instance, if a population comprised of many individuals with bisexual cyathia one year suddenly switches to producing mostly male cyathia the following year, seed production can decrease greatly. Until we know more about the reproductive ecology of this species, maintaining populations with regular fire while limiting the amount of logging and development is the best chance we have at ensuring this extremely rare spurge has a future on this planet.

The one upside to this story is that, where properly managed, Telephus spurge can reach high abundances. With a little bit of effort, these populations are relatively easy to map and seed can be collected and maintained to preserve valuable genetic material. Still, without proper management and land conservation/restoration efforts, the future of this tiny spurge and many of its botanical neighbors hangs in the balance. Support your local land conservancy today, because stories like this are far more common than you think!

Further Reading: [1] [2]

The Future of New Zealand's Shrubby Tororaro Lies in Cultivation

Photo by Jon Sullivan licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0

I was watching a gardening show hosted by one of my favorite gardeners, Carol Klein, when she introduced viewers to a beautiful, divaricating shrub whose branching structure looked like a dense tracery of orange twigs. She referred to the shrub as a wiggy wig and remarked on its beauty and form before moving on to another wonderful plant. I was taken aback by the structure of the shrub and had to learn more. Certainly its form had to be the result of delicate pruning and selective breeding. Imagine my surprise when I found its growth habit was inherent to this wonderful and rare species.

The wiggy wig or shrubby tororaro is known to science as Muehlenbeckia astonii. It is a member of the buckwheat family (Polygonaceae) endemic to grey scrub habitats of eastern New Zealand. Though this species is widely cultivated for its unique appearance, the shrubby tororaro is not faring well in the wild. For reasons I will cover in a bit, this unique shrub is considered endangered. To understand some of these threats as well as what it will take to bring it back from the brink, we must first take a closer look at its ecology.

Photo by WJV&DB licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

As mentioned, the shrubby tororaro is endemic to grey scrub habitats of eastern New Zealand. It is a long lived species, with individuals living upwards of 80 years inder the right conditions. Because its habitat is rather dry, the shrubby tororaro grows a deep taproot that allows it to access water deep within the soil. That is not to say that it doesn’t have to worry about drought. Indeed, the shrubby tororaro also has a deciduous habit, dropping most if not all of its tiny, heart-shaped leaves when conditions become too dry. During the wetter winter months, its divaricating twigs become bathed in tiny, cream colored flowers that are very reminiscent of the buckwheat family. From a reproductive standpoint, its flowers are quite interesting.

The shrubby tororaro is gynodioecious, which means individual shrubs produce either only female flowers or what is referred to as ‘inconstant male flowers.’ Essentially what this means is that certain individuals will produce some perfect flowers that have functional male and female parts. This reproductive strategy is thought to increase the chances of cross pollination among unrelated individuals when populations are large enough. Following successful pollination, the remaining tepals begin to swell and surround the hard nut at the center, forming a lovely translucent fruit-like structure that entices dispersal by birds. As interesting and effective as this reproductive strategy can be in healthy populations, the shrubby tororaro’s gynodioecious habit starts to break down as its numbers decrease in the wild.

Photo by Jon Sullivan licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0

As New Zealand was colonized, lowland habitats like the grey scrub were among the first to be converted to agriculture and that trend has not stopped. What grey scrub habitat remains today is highly degraded by intense grazing and invasive species. Habitat loss has been disastrous for the shrubby tororaro and its neighbors. Though this shrub was likely never common, today only a few widely scattered populations remain and most of these are located on private property, which make regular monitoring and protection difficult.

Observations made within remnant populations indicate that very little reproduction occurs anymore. Either populations are comprised of entirely female individuals or the few inconstant males that are produced are too widely spaced for pollination to occur. Even when a crop of viable seeds are produced, seedlings rarely find the proper conditions needed to germinate and grow. Invasive grasses and other plants shade them out and invasive insects and rodents consume the few that manage to make it to the seedling stage. Without intervention, this species will likely go extinct in the wild in the coming decades.

Photo by John Pons licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

Luckily, conservation measures are well underway and they involve cultivation by scientists and gardeners alike. There is a reason this shrub has become very popular among gardeners - it is relatively easy to grow and propagate. From hardwood cuttings taken in winter, the shrubby tororaro will readily root and grow into a clone of the parent plant. Not only has this aided in spreading the plant among gardeners, it has also allowed conservationists to preserve and bolster much of the genetic diversity within remaining wild populations. By cloning, growing, and distributing individuals among various living collections, conservationists have at least safeguarded many of the remaining individuals.

Moreover, cultivation on this scale means dwindling wild populations can be supplemented with unrelated individuals that produce both kinds of flowers. By increasing the numbers within each population, conservationists are also decreasing the distances between female and inconstant male individuals, which means more chances for pollination and seed production. Though by no means out of the proverbial woods yet, the shrubby tororaro’s future in the wild is looking a bit brighter.

This is good news for biodiversity of the region as well. After all, the shrubby tororaro does not exist in a vacuum. Numerous other organisms rely on this shrub for their survival. Birds feed heavily on its fruits and disperse its seeds while the larvae of at least a handful of moths feed on its foliage. In fact, the larvae of a few moths utilize the shrubby tororaro as their sole food source. Without it, these moths would perish as well. Of course, those larvae also serve as food for birds and lizards. Needless to say, saving the shrubby tororaro benefits far more than just the plant itself. Certainly more work is needed to restore shrubby tororaro habitat but in the meantime, cultivation is ensuring this species will persist into the future.

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3]

The Ceropegias Welcome a New Member

Photos by David Styles

The genus Ceropegia is home to some of my favorite plants. Not only are they distant cousins of the milkweeds (Asclepias spp.), they sport some of the most interesting floral morphologies whose beauty is only exceeded by their fascinating pollination syndromes. Recently, Ceropegia expert and friend of the podcast Dr. Annemarie Heiduk brought to my attention the recent description of a species named in her honor.

Ceropegia heidukiae hails from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and, at current, is believed to be endemic to a habitat type called the Northern Zululand Mistbelt Grassland. Morphologically, it has been described as an erect perennial herb. Unlike many of its cousins, C. heidukiae does not vine. Instead, it grows a slender stem with opposite, ovate leaves that just barely reaches above the surrounding grasses. By far the most striking feature of this plant are its flowers.

Photos by David Styles.

Ceropegia heidukiae produces elaborate trap flowers at the tips of its slender stems during the month of December (summer in the Southern Hemisphere). Each flower is comprised a greenish-gold, striped tube made of fused petals and topped with a purple, star-like structure with fine hairs. These flowers were the key indication that this species was previously unknown to science. Additionally, a sweet, acidic scent was detected during the relatively short blooming period.

Their beauty aside, the anatomy and scent of these flowers hints at what may very well be a complex and specific pollination syndrome. Indeed, scientists like Dr. Heiduk are revealing amazing chemical trickery within the flowers of this incredible genus, including one species that mimics the smell of dying bees. Who knows what kinds of relationships this new species has evolved in its unique habitat. Only plenty of observation and experimentation will tell and I anxiously await future studies.

A view of the Northern Zululand Mistbelt Grassland where Ceropegia heidukiae was found.

Sadly, C. heidukiae lives in one of South Africa’s most threatened habitat types. South Africa’s Biodiversity Act currently classifies the Northern Zululand Mistbelt Grassland as endangered due to factors like timber plantations and unsustainable grazing. Hopefully with the recognition of unique species like C. heidukiae, more attention can be given to sustainable use of the Northern Zululand Mistbelt Grassland such that both the people and the species that rely on it can continue to do so for generations to come.

Photo Credits: David Styles

Further Reading: [1] [2]

The Ancient Green Blobs of the Andes

Photo by Atlas of Wonders licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Curious images of these strange green mounds make the rounds of social media every so often. What kind of alien life form is this? Is it a moss? Is it a fungus? The answer may surprise you!

These large, green mounds are comprised of a colony of plants in the carrot family! The Yareta, or Azorella compacta, hails from the Andes and only grows between 3,200 and 4,500 meters (10,500 - 14,750 ft) in elevation. Its tightly compacted growth habit is an adaptation to its high elevation lifestyle. Cushion growth like this helps these plants prevent heat and water loss in these cold, dry, windy environments.

Every so often, these mats erupt with tiny flowers, which must be a sight to behold! Photo by Lon&Queta licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

As you might imagine, these plants are extremely slow growers. By studying their growth rates over time, experts estimate that individual colonies expand at the rate of roughly 1.5 cm each year. By extrapolating these rates to the measurements of large colonies, we get a remarkable picture of how old some of these plants truly are. Indeed, some of the largest colonies are estimated at over 3000 years old, making them some of the oldest living organisms on the planet!

Sadly, the dense growth of the plant makes it highly sought after as a fuel source. Massive chunks of these plants are harvested with pick axes and burned as a source of heat. Due to their slow growth rate, overharvesting in recent years has caused a serious decline in Yareta populations. Local governments have since enacted laws to protect this species in hopes that it will give colonies the time they need to recover. Indeed, some recovery has already been documented, however, continued monitoring and management will be needed to ensure their populations remain viable into the foreseeable future.

Photo Credits: [1] [2]

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3]

A Rare Succulent Member of the Milkweed Family

Photo by: Gennaro Re

Across nearly every ecosystem on Earth, biodiversity tends to follow a pattern in which there are a small handful of very common species and many, many more rare species. It would seem our knowledge of plants follows a similar pattern; we know a lot about a small group of species and very little to nothing about most others. Take, for example, a succulent relative of the milkweeds known to science as Whitesloanea crassa. Despite its occurrence in specialist succulent plant collections, we know next to nothing about the natural history of this species or if it even still exists in the wild at all.

Without flowers, one would be hard pressed to place this odd succulent within a family. Even when in bloom, proper analysis of its taxonomic affinity requires a close inspection of the floral morphology. What W. crassa exhibits is a highly derived morphology well-adapted to its xeric environment. Native to Somalia, it was said to grow on bare ground and its appearance supposedly matches the rocks that dominate its desert habitat. Never producing leaves or branches, the main body of W. crassa consists of a succulent, quadrangular stem that slowly grows upwards as it ages.

Flowers are produced in a dense inflorescence, which is most often situated near the base of the plant. Each flower is very showy at maturity, consisting of a fleshy, fused, 5-lobed corolla decorated in shades of pink and red. As far as I can tell, this is not one of stinkier members of the family. Though I have found pictures of flowers crawling with maggots, most growers fail to comment on any strong odors. In fact, aside from limited care instructions, detailed descriptions of the plant represent the bulk of the scientific information available on this odd species.

Maggots crawling around inside the flowers indicates this species mimics carrion as its pollination mechanism. Photo by: Flavio Agrosi

As I mentioned, it is hard to say whether this species still exists in the wild or not. The original mention of this plant in the literature dates back to 1914. A small population of W. crassa was found in northern Somalia and a few individuals were shipped overseas where they didn’t really make much of an impact on botanists or growers at that time. It would be another 21 years before this plant would receive any additional scientific attention. Attempts to relocate that original population failed but thanks to a handful of cultivated specimens that had finally flowered, W. crassa was given a proper description in 1935. After that time, W. crassa once again slipped back into the world of horticultural obscurity.

A few decades later, two additional trips were made to try and locate additional W. crassa populations. Botanical expeditions to Somalia in 1957 and again in 1986 did manage to locate a few populations of this succulent and it is likely that most of the plants growing in cultivation today are descended from collections made during those periods. However, trying to find any current information on the status of this plant ends there. Some say it has gone extinct, yet another species lost to over-collection and agriculture. Others claim that populations still exist but their whereabouts are kept as a closely guarded secret by locals. Though such claims are largely unsubstantiated, I certainly hope the latter is true and the former is not.

Photo by: Flavio Agrosi

Our knowledge of W. crassa is thus restricted to what we can garner from cultivated specimens. It is interesting to think of how much about this species will remain a mystery simply because we have been unable to observe it in the wild. Despite these limitations, cultivation has nonetheless provided brief windows into it’s evolutionary history. Because of its rock-like appearance, it was assumed that W. crassa was related to the similar-looking members of the genus Pseudolithos. However, genetic analysis indicates that it is not all that closely related to this genus. Instead, W. crassa shares a much closer relationship to Huernia and Duvalia.

This is where the story ends unfortunately. Occasionally one can find cultivated individuals for sale and when you do, they are usually attached to a decent price tag. Those lucky enough to grow this species successfully seem to hold it in high esteem. If you are lucky enough to own one of these plants or to have at least laid eyes on one in person, cherish the experience. Also, consider sharing said experiences on the web. The more information we have on mysterious species like W. crassa, the better the future will be for species like this. With any luck, populations of this plant still exist in the wild, their locations known only to those who live nearby, and maybe one day a lucky scientist will finally get the chance to study its ecology a little bit better.

Photo Credits: [1] & Flavio Agrosi [2] [3] [4]

Further Reading: [1] [2]

Fraser Fir: A New Look at an Old Friend

Photo by James St. John licensed under CC BY 2.0

Growing up, Fraser fir (Abies fraseri) was a fairly common sight in our house. Each winter this species would usually win out over other options as the preferred tree for our living room during the holiday season. Indeed, its pleasing shape, lovely color, and soft needles have made it one of the most popular Christmas trees around the world. Amazingly, despite its popularity as a decoration, Fraser fir is so rare in the wild that it is considered an endangered species.

Fraser fir is native to only a handful of areas in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Together with red spruce (Picea rubens), this conifer makes up one of the rarest ecosystems on the continent - the southern Appalachian spruce-fir forest. Such forests only exist at elevations above 4,000 ft (1,200 m) from southwestern Virginia to western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. The reason for this limited distribution is rooted in both modern day climate and North America’s glacial past.

USGS/Public Domain

Whereas anyone hiking through Appalachian spruce-fir forests could readily draw similarities to boreal forests found farther north, the Appalachian spruce-fir forests are nonetheless unique, hosting many species found nowhere else in the world. Indeed, these forests are holdovers from the Pleistocene when the southeast was much cooler than it is today. As glaciers retreated and the climate warmed, Appalachian spruce-fir forests “retreated” up the mountains, following their preferred climate zones until they hit the peaks of mountains and couldn’t go any further.

Indeed, Fraser fir is in large part limited in its distribution by temperature. This conifer does not perform well at high temperatures and is readily out-competed by other species under warmer conditions. Another factor that has maintained Appalachian spruce-fir forests at elevation is fog. The southern Appalachian Mountains host eastern North America’s only temperate rainforest and fog commonly blankets high elevation areas throughout the year. Research has shown that in addition to keeping these areas cool, fog also serves as an important source of water for Fraser fir and its neighbors. As fog condenses on its needles, these trees are able to absorb that water, keeping them hydrated even when rain is absent.

A view of an Appalachian spruce-fir forest from the Blue Ridge Parkway.

Due to its restricted habitat, Fraser fir has never been extremely common. However, things got even worse as Europeans colonized North America. Over the past two centuries, unsustainable logging and grazing practices have decimated southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests, fragmenting them into even smaller patches with no connectivity in between. In areas where thin, rocky soils were not completely washed away, Fraser fir seedlings did return, however, this was not always the case. In areas where soils were were lost, southern Appalachian spruce–fir forests were incapable of regenerating.

If the story ended there, Fraser fir and its habitat would still be in trouble but sadly, things only got worse with the introduction of the invasive balsam woolly adelgid (Adelges piceae) from Europe around 1900. Like the hemlock woolly adlegid, this invasive, sap-feeding insect has decimated Fraser fir populations throughout southern Appalachia. Having shared no evolutionary history with the adelgid, Fraser fir is essentially defenseless and estimates suggest that upwards of 90% of infect trees have been killed by the invasion. Although plenty of Fraser fir seedlings have sprung up in the wake of this destruction, experts fear that as soon as those trees grow large enough to start forming fissures in their bark, the balsam woolly adelgid will once again experience a massive population boom and repeat the process of destruction again.

Dead Fraser fir as seen from Clingman’s Dome. Photo by Brian Stansberry licensed under CC BY 3.0

The loss of Fraser fir from this imperiled ecosystem has had a ripple effect. Fraser fir is much sturdier than its red spruce neighbors and thus provides an important windbreak, protecting other trees from the powerful gusts that sweep over the mountain tops on a regular basis. With a decline in the Fraser fir canopy, red spruce and other trees are more susceptible to blowdowns. Also, the dense, evergreen canopy of these Appalachian spruce-fir forests produces a unique microclimate that fosters the growth of myriad mosses, liverworts, ferns, and herbs that in turn support species like the endangered endemic spruce-fir moss spider (Microhexura montivaga). As Fraser fir is lost from these areas, the species that it once supported decline as well, placing the whole ecosystem at risk of collapse.

The moss-dominated understory of an Appalachian spruce-fir forest supports species found nowhere else in the world. Photo by Miguel.v licensed under CC BY 3.0

Luckily, the plight of this tree and the habitat it supports has not gone unnoticed by conservationists. Numerous groups and agencies are working on conserving and restoring Fraser fir and southern Appalachian spruce-fir forests to at least a portion of their former glory. This is not an easy task by any means. Aside from lack of funding and human power, southern Appalachian spruce-fir forest conservation and restoration is hindered by the ever present threat of a changing climate. Fears that the life-giving fog that supports this ecosystem may be changing make it difficult to prioritize areas suitable for reforestation. Also, the continued threat from invasive species like the balsam woolly adelgid can hamper even the best restoration and conservation efforts. Still, this doesn’t mean we must give up hope. With continued collaboration and effort, we can still ensure that this unique ecosystem has a chance to persist.

Please visit the Central Appalachian Spruce Restoration Initiative (CASRI) website to learn more!

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [4] [5]

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Dwarf Sumac: North America's Rarest Rhus

James Henderson, Golden Delight Honey, Bugwood.org.

In honor of my conversation with Anacardiaceae specialist, Dr. Susan Pell, I wanted to dedicate some time to looking at a member of this family that is in desperate need of more attention. I would like you to meet the dwarf sumac (Rhus michauxii). Found only in a few scattered locations throughout the Coastal Plain and Piedmont regions of southeastern North America, this small tree is growing increasingly rare.

Dwarf sumac is a small species, with most individuals maxing out around 1 - 3 feet (30.5 – 91 cm) in height. It produces compound fuzzy leaves with wonderfully serrated leaflets. It flowers throughout early and mid-summer, with individuals producing an upright inflorescence that is characteristic of what one might expect from the genus Rhus. Dwarf sumac is dioecious, meaning individual plants produce either male or female flowers. Also, like many of its cousins, dwarf sumac is highly clonal, sending out runners in all directions that grow into clones of the original. The end result of this habit is large populations comprised of a single genetic individual producing only one type of flower.

Current range of dwarf sumac (Rhus michauxii). Green indicates native presence in state, Yellow indicates present in county but rare, and Orange indicates historical occurrence that has since been extirpated. [SOURCE]

Research indicates that the pygmy sumac was likely never wide spread or common throughout its range. Its dependence on specific soil conditions (namely sandy or rocky, basic soils) and just the right amount of disturbance mean it is pretty picky as to where it can thrive. However, humans have pushed this species far beyond natural tolerances. A combination of agriculture, development, and fire sequestration have all but eliminated most of its historical occurrences.

Today, the remaining dwarf sumac populations are few and far between. Its habit of clonal spread complicates matters even more because remaining populations are largely comprised of clonal offshoots of single individuals that are either male or female, making sexual reproduction almost non-existent in most cases. Also, aside from outright destruction, a lack of fire has also been disastrous for the species. Dwarf sumac requires fairly open habitat to thrive and without regular fires, it is readily out-competed by surrounding vegetation.

A female infructescence. Photo by Alan Cressler

Luckily, dwarf sumac has gotten enough attention to earn it protected status as a federally listed endangered species. However, this doesn’t mean all is well in dwarf sumac land. Lack of funding and overall interest in this species means monitoring of existing populations is infrequent and often done on a volunteer basis. At least one study pointed out that some of the few remaining populations have only been monitored once, which means it is anyone’s guess as to their current status or whether they still exist at all. Some studies also indicate that dwarf sumac is capable of hybridizing with related species such as whinged sumac (Rhus copallinum).

Another complicating factor is that some populations occur in some surprisingly rundown places that can make conservation difficult. Because dwarf sumac relies on disturbance to keep competing vegetation at bay, some populations now exist along highway rights-of way, roadsides, and along the edges of artificially maintained clearings. While this is good news for current population numbers, ensuring that these populations are looked after and maintained is a difficult task when interests outside of conservation are involved.

Some of the best work being done to protect this species involves propagation and restoration. Though still limited in its scope and success, out-planting into new location in addition to augmenting existing populations offers hope of at least slowing dwarf sumac decline in the wild. Special attention has been given to planting genetically distinct male and female plants into existing clonal populations in hopes of increasing pollination and seed set. Though it is too early to count these few attempts as true successes, they do offer a glimmer of hope. Other conservation attempts involve protecting what little habitat remains for this species and encouraging better land management via prescribed burns and invasive species removal.

The future for dwarf sumac remains uncertain, but that doesn’t mean all hope is lost. With more attention and research, this species just may be saved from total destruction. The plight of species like the dwarf sumac serve as an important reminder of why both habitat conservation and restoration are so important for slowing biodiversity loss.

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3]

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3]James Henderson, Golden Delight Honey, Bugwood.org.

A Remarkable Floral Radiation on Hawai'i

Ohaha (Brighamia rockii)

Hawai’i is home to so many interesting species of plants, many of which are found nowhere else in the world. One group however, stands out among the rest in that it represents the largest plant radiation not just in Hawai’i, but on any island archipelago!

I am of course talking about the Hawaiian lobelioids (Campanulaceae). Many of you will be familiar with members of the genus Lobelia, which include the lovely cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis) and the great blue lobelia (Lobelia siphilitica), but the 6 genera that comprise the Hawaiian radiation are something quite different altogether.

'Oha Wai (Clermontia samuelii). Photo by Forest and Kim Starr licensed under CC BY 2.0

Numbering roughly 125 species in total (in addition to many extinct species), it was long thought that the diversity of Hawaiian lobelioids were the result of at least 3 separate dispersal events. Thanks to recent DNA analysis, it is now believed that all 6 genera are the result of one single dispersal event by a lobelia-like ancestor. This may seem ridiculous but when you consider the fact that this invasion happened back when Gardner Pinnacles and French Frigate Shoals were actual islands and none of the extant islands even existed, then you can begin to grasp the time scales involved that produced such a drastic and varied radiation.

Delissea sp.

Sadly, like countless Hawaiian endemics, the invasion of the human species has spelled disaster. Hawaiian endemics are declining at an alarming rate due to threats like introduced pigs and rats that eat seeds, devour seedlings, and even go as far as to chew right through the stems of adult plants. To make matters worse, many species evolved to a specific suite of pollinators.

ʻŌlulu (Brighamia insignis)

Take, for instance, the case of the ʻŌlulu (Brighamia insignis). It is believed to have evolved a pollination syndrome with a species of sphinx moth known as the fabulous green sphinx moth (Tinostoma smaragditis), which is also believed to be extinct. Similarly, the ʻŌhā wai nui (Clermontia arborescens) evolved for pollination by the island's endemic honey creepers. Due to avian malaria and other human impacts, many honey creepers are endangered and some have already gone extinct. Without their pollinators, many of these lobelioids are doomed to slow extinction if they haven't disappeared already.

While it may be too late to bring back species that have likely gone extinct, that doesn’t mean conservation of these incredible plants is off the table. Indeed, many efforts are being put forth by institutions like the National Tropical Botanical Garden and the Chicago Botanic Gardens to help conserve and restore some of these species. Along the way, the Hawaiian lobelioids are teaching us important and timely lessons on the need for understanding and protecting all pieces of Earth’s ecosystems, rather than individual parts in isolation.

LISTEN TO EPISODE 291 OF THE IN DEFENSE OF PLANTS PODCAST TO LEARN MORE ABOUT LOBELIOID CONSERVATION IN HAWAI’I

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Further Reading: [1] [2]

The ancestors of many Hibiscus cultivars are in trouble

The genus Hibiscus contains some of the most widely recognized and venerated plants on Earth. Take a trip to any garden center and nursery and you are almost guaranteed to find numerous brightly colored Hibiscus cultivars. No doubt many of you reading this probably have one growing in or around your home. For as common as these cultivars are, most of the species that were involved in producing them are either critically endangered or feared extinct in the wild.

Many of the common tropical Hibiscus cultivars you are likely to encounter involve Hibiscus rosa-sinensis and around 10 distinct species hailing from either one of the Mascarene islands in the Indian Ocean or one of the numerous islands in the central and south Pacific. All of these plants belong to a subgroup within the mallow family known scientifically as Lilibiscus. I won’t bore you with the taxonomic details but what is important to know is that, despite their wide and often non-overlapping distributions, members of this group readily hybridize with one another. It’s this penchant for hybridization that has made them so popular with plant breeders over the centuries.

Hibiscus rosa-sinensis by B.Navex licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0.

In fact, the ease with which these plants are cultivated and bred has obscured the origins of the aforementioned Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Today, this lovely red mallow grows wild throughout many regions of the Asian continent, however, experts believe that many of these populations represent “escapes” from cultivation. This species has enjoyed so much popularity over the years that no one is quite sure where it originated. Sadly, the same cannot be said for its relatives.

Islands both big and small are metaphorical playgrounds for evolution. This is why islands often boast species of both plant and animal that are found nowhere else in the world. Unfortunately, many of the factors that make islands such hot spots for evolution also make them hot spots for extinctions. Isolation, limited land area, and stochastic events combine to make it all too easy to lose island flora and fauna for good. Add humans into the mix and things get even worse. Humans have been the cause of countless island extinctions ever since our species began island hopping.

The critically endangered Hibiscus fragilis. By Wendy Strahm licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0.

For the case of these 10 members of Lilibiscus, a human presence on their islands of origins has been devastating. Habitat loss due to farming and development and the introduction of invasive species have all but wiped out most populations. For species like Hibiscus fragilis, an endemic of Mauritius, their numbers have been reduced to only a small handful of plants in the wild. Other species like Hibiscus storckii, an endemic of Fiji, were thought to be completely extinct until a few plants were rediscovered. It would seem that after the initial collections were made and brought into cultivation, no one gave these plants much thought. Forgotten, they dwindled in numbers until few, if any, remained.

As if things weren’t already bad for these rare Hibiscus species, humans are adding yet another nail in the coffin for many of them - hybridization. Because Hibiscus are so popular as garden plants, cultivars are commonly planted in gardens wherever climates allow. As I mentioned above, members of the Lilibiscus group readily hybridize with one another. Whereas cultivars are guided by human intervention, that doesn’t mean they need humans to mix their genes. If a cultivar is planted in the proximity of a wild species, there is nothing stopping pollinators from visiting and exchanging pollen with both plants.

Hibiscus storckii was once thought to be extinct until a few plants were rediscovered. BY Jeff Delonge licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0.

If a hybrid cultivar picks up new genes from its wild relatives, no big deal. Either those seeds will never be left to germinate or, if they do, a surprising new variety could be made. Things aren’t so innocuous when gene flow happens in the other direction. One of the biggest threats to the conservation of species like H. fragilis now comes from hybridization with garden Hibiscus. Cultivars are not selected for their ability to thrive in the wild. They are bred and selected for large, showy flowers and a prolonged blooming period. These are not good traits for a wild species with a very specific niche. As the remaining wild H. fragilis are swamped with hybrid genes from cultivars growing in nearby gardens, their offspring no longer contain the characteristics that makes this species unique. One or two hybrids every now and then is probably not an issue, but if those hybrids survive and flower, the stability and fitness of that population will gradually decline as repeated backcrossing occurs.

These issues are not restricted only to the species mentioned above. The tropical cultivars we know and love represent a hybridization complex of Hibiscus species such as H. arnottianus, H. boryanus, H. denisonii, H. genevii, H. kokio, H. liliiflorus, and H. schizopetalus. Nearly all of these species are suffering similar fates in their native range. However, there is a silver lining to all of this. Because Hibiscus often lend so well to cultivation, conservationists have been able to step in before some species are lost forever. Seeds have been collected for both seed banking and germination trials, cuttings have been taken and grown into clones as a means of preserving what genetic diversity remains, and botanical gardens around the world are now adding many of these species to their living collections.

Though the future is not certain for many of these plants, it is certainly looking much better than it was only a few decades ago. While human activity has caused most of these problems, our efforts are now critical in reversing at least some of the damage that has been done.

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3]

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3] [4]

North America's Climbing Fern

There are few things on a hike that get me pumped more than hearing someone call out "Hey, I found something weird over here!" It's even more exciting when that person knows what they are talking about. Sometimes that "something" is a familiar species in a strange spot, or growing in a strange way. Sometimes, however, it is something new and exciting that you have been wanting to encounter for years.

This is how I finally met the American climbing fern (Lygodium palmatum). Tangled among the branches of a shrub was indeed a strange site. The tiny, palmate pinnules are not a dead giveaway as to its true identity. Regardless of looks, this is in fact a fern. It is the only member of this genus native to North America. Its cousins, the Japanese climbing fern (Lygodium japonicum) and the Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyllum) can also be found on this continent but they have become very invasive in the southeast.

I know what some of you may be thinking, "if this is a fern then where are the fronds?" This was my first thought as well. My first guess was aimed at each palmate leaf. Wrong. The correct answer is the whole vine! Each climbing vine of this fern is a single frond. The palmate leaves are actually the pinnules. The stem, or rachis as it is called in ferns, twines around branches and stems in a vine-like fashion, unfurling pinnules as it goes. What is most impressive is that these fronds can grow as long as 15 feet. Quite impressive by North American fern standards. Fertile pinnules form at the ends of these fronds. Their lacy appearance is quite beautiful juxtaposed with the hand-like, sterile pinnules.

The American climbing fern can be found growing throughout eastern North America. It is a fern of wet places, enjoying acidic soils and bright sunlight. Unfortunately its preference for wetlands has landed it on threatened and endangered lists throughout its range. Our nasty habit of draining, farming, and developing wetlands means that the American climbing fern (as well as many of the other species it shares its habitat with) is losing habitat at an alarming rate.

Further Reading:
http://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=LYPA3

Mysterious Franklinia

Photo by Tom Potterfield licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

In 1765, a pair of botanists, John and William Bartram, observed "several very curious shrubs" growing in one small area along the banks of the Altamaha River in what is now Georgia. Again in 1773, William Bartram returned to this same area. He reported that he "was greatly delighted at the appearance of two beautiful shrubs in all their blooming graces. One of them appeared to be a species of Gordonia, but the flowers are larger, and more fragrant than those of the Gordonia lasianthus.” The species Bartram was referring to was not a Gordonia, but rather a unique species in a genus all of its own. After years of study, Bartram would name the plant in honor of a close family friend, Benjamin Franklin.

This tree is none other than the Franklin tree - Franklinia alatamaha. This beautiful member of the tea family (Theaceae) is unique in that it no longer exists outside of cultivation. It is completely extinct in the wild. However, this is not a recent extinction brought on by the industrialization of North America. IT would seem that Franklinia was nearing extinction before Europeans ever made it to North America. As Bartram first noted "We never saw it grow in any other place, nor have I ever since seen it growing wild, in all my travels, from Pennsylvania to Point Coupe, on the banks of the Mississippi, which must be allowed a very singular and unaccountable circumstance; at this place there are two or 3 acres of ground where it grows plentifully." Indeed, no reports of this species came from anywhere other than that two to three acre section of land on he banks of the Altamaha River. The last confirmed sighting of Franklinia in the wild was in 1790.

Photo by Krzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz licensed by CC BY-SA 4.0

What happened to Franklinia? The truth is, no one really knows. Many theories have been put forth to try to explain the disappearance of this unique shrub. What can be agreed on at this point is that Franklinia was probably mostly extinct by the time Europeans arrived. One thought is that it was a northern species that "escaped" glaciation thanks to a few scattered populations in southeastern North America. Indeed, it has been well documented that plants grown in the northern US fare a lot better than those grown in the south. It is thought that perhaps Franklinia was not well adapted to the hot southern climate and slowly dwindled in numbers before it had a chance to expand its range back north after the glaciers retreated.

Others blame early botanists for collecting this already rare species out of existence. What few trees may have remained could easily have been whipped out by a stochastic event like a flood or fire. Another possibility is that habitat loss from Indigenous and subsequent European settlement coupled with disease introduced via cotton farming proved too much for a small, genetically shallow population to handle. In my opinion, it was probably the combination of all of these factors that lead to the extinction of Franklinia in the wild.

Photo by Tony Rodd licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Anyone growing this tree may notice some funny aspects of its ecology. For instance, it blooms in September, which is a lot later than most North American flowering tree species. Also, the fruits take a long time to mature, needing 13 - 15 months on the tree to be viable. The combination of these strange quirks of Franklinia biology as well as its inability to handle drought (a condition quite common in its only known natural range in Georgia), lends credence to the glacial retreat theory.

We do owe Bartram though. Without him, this species may have disappeared entirely. During his expeditions to Georgia, he collected a few seeds from that Franklinia population. Any Franklinia trees growing in gardens today are direct descendants of those original collections. Franklinia is yet another plant species kept alive by cultivation. Without its addition to gardens all over the country, this species would have been lost forever, living on in our minds as illustrations and herbarium specimens.

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3]

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Encounters With a Rare White-Topped Carnivore

I am not a list maker. Never have been and never will be. That being said, there are always going to be certain plants that I feel I need to see in the wild before I die. The white-topped pitcher plant (Sarracenia leucophylla) was one such plant.

I will never forget the first time I laid eyes on one of these plants. It was at a carnivorous plant club meeting in which the theme had been “show and tell.” Local growers were proudly showcasing select plants from their collections and it was a great introduction to many groups which, at the time, I was unfamiliar with. Such was the case for the taller pitcher plants in the genus Sarracenia. Up until that point, I had only ever encountered the squat purple pitcher plant (S. purpurea).

I rounded the corner to a row of display tables and was greeted with a line of stunning botanical pitfall traps. Nestled in among the greens, reds, and yellows was a single pot full of tremendously white, green, and red pitcher plants. I picked my jaw up off the floor and inquired. This was the first time I had seen Sarracenia leucophylla. At that point I knew I had to see such a beauty in the wild.

More like white and red top…

It would be nearly a decade before that dream came true. On my recent trip to the Florida panhandle, I learned that there may be a chance to see this species in situ. Needless to say, this plant nerd was feeling pretty ecstatic. Between survey sites, we pulled down a long road and parked our vehicle. I could tell that there was a large clearing just beyond the ditch, on the other side of the trees.

The clearing turned out to be an old logging site. Apparently the site was not damaged too severely during the process as the plant diversity was pretty impressive. We put on our boots and slogged our way down an old two track nearly knee deep in dark, tanic water. All around us we could see amazing species of Sabatia, Lycopodiella, Drosera, and so much more. We didn’t walk far before something white caught my eye.

There to the left of me was a small patch of S. leucophylla. I had a hard time keeping it together. I wanted to jump up and down, run around, and let off all of the excited energy that had built up that morning. I decided to reign it in, however, as I had to be extra careful not to trample any of the other incredible plants growing near by. It is always sad to see the complete disregard even seasoned botanists have for plants that are unlucky enough to be growing next door to a species deemed “more exciting,” but I digress.

Sarracenia leucophylla flower. Photo by Noah Elhardt licensed by GNU Free Documentation License [SOURCE]

This was truly a moment I needed to savor. I took a few pictures and then put my camera away to simply enjoyed being in the presence of such an evolutionary marvel. If you know how pitcher plants work then you will be familiar with S. leucophylla. Its brightly colored pitchers are pitfall traps. Insects lured in by the bright colors, sweet smell, and tasty extrafloral nectar eventually lose their footing and fall down into the mouth of the pitcher. Once they have passed the rim, escape is unlikely. Downward pointing hairs and slippery walls ensure that few, if any, insects can crawl back out.

What makes this species so precious (other than its amazing appearance) is just how rare it has become. Sarracenia leucophylla is a poster child for the impact humans are having on this entire ecosystem. It can only be found in a few scattered locations along the Gulf Coast of North America. The main threat to this species is, of course, loss of habitat.

A large conservation population growing ex situ at the Atlanta Botanical Garden.

Southeastern North America has seen an explosion in its human population over the last few decades and that has come at great cost to wild spaces. Destruction from human development, agriculture, and timber production have seen much of its wetland habitats disappear. What is left has been severely degraded by a loss of fire. Fires act as a sort of reset button on the vegetation dynamics of fire-prone habitats by clearing the area of vegetation. Without fires, species like S. leucophylla are quickly out-competed by more aggressive plants, especially woody shrubs like titi (Cyrilla racemiflora).

Another major threat to this species is poaching, though the main reasons may surprise you. Though S. leucophylla is a highly sought-after species by carnivorous plant growers, its ease of propagation means seed grown plants are usually readily available. That is not to say poaching for the plant trade doesn’t happen. It does and the locations of wild populations are best kept secret.

Sarracenia leucophylla habitat. Photo by Brad Adler licensed by CC BY-SA 2.5 [SOURCE]

The main issue with poaching involves the cut flower trade. Florists looking to add something exotic to their floral displays have taken to using the brightly colored pitchers of various Sarracenia species. One or two pitchers from a population probably doesn’t hurt the plants very much but reports of entire populations having their pitchers removed are not uncommon to hear about. It is important to realize that not only do the pitchers provide these plants with much-needed nutrients, they are also the main photosynthetic organs. Without them, plants will starve and die.

I think at this point my reasons for excitement are pretty obvious. Wandering around we found a handful more plants and a few even had ripening seed pods. By far the coolest part of the encounter came when I noticed a couple damaged pitchers. I bent down and noticed that they had holes chewed out of the pitcher walls and all were positioned about half way up the pitcher.

I peered down into one of these damaged pitchers and was greeted by two tiny moths. Each moth was yellow with a black head and thick black bands on each wing. A quick internet search revealed that these were very special moths indeed. What we had found was a species of moth called the pitcher plant mining moth (Exyra semicrocea).

An adult pitcher plant mining moth (Exyra semicrocea) sitting within a pitcher!

Amazingly, the lives of these moths are completely tied to the lives of the pitcher plants. Their larvae feed on nothing else. As if seeing this rare plant wasn’t incredible enough, I was witnessing such a wonderfully specific symbiotic relationship right before my very eyes.

Fortunately, the plight of S. leucophylla has not gone unnoticed by conservationists. Lots of attention is being paid to protecting remaining populations, collecting seeds, and reintroducing plants to part of their former range. For instance, it has been estimated that efforts to protect this species by the Atlanta Botanical Garden have safeguarded most of the genetic diversity that remains for S. leucophylla. Outside of direct conservation efforts, many agencies both public and private are bringing fire back into the ecology of these systems. Fires benefit so much more than S. leucophylla. They are restoring the integrity and resiliency of these biodiverse wetland habitats.

LEARN MORE ABOUT WHAT PLACES LIKE THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN ARE DOING TO PROTECT IMPORTANT PLANT HABITATS THROUGHOUT THE SOUTHEAST AND MORE.

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Let's Talk About Recruitment

Photo by --Tico-- licensed by CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

For any species to be considered successful, it must replace itself generation after generation. We call this process recruitment and it is very important. After all, reproduction is arguably the most fundamental aspect of life in a Darwinian sense. For plants, this can be done either vegetatively or sexually via seeds and spores. Though vegetative reproduction is a fundamental process for many plants around the globe, seed or spore germination is arguably the most important. To truly understand what a plant needs, we have to understand its germination requirements.

Recruitment is a considerable limiting factor for plant populations. In fact, it is the first major bottleneck plants must pass through. It is estimated that a majority of plant mortality occurs during the germination and seedling stages. However, not all plants are equal in this way. Some plants are considered seed or propagule limited whereas others are habitat limited.

If a plant is seed limited, it means that its ability to expand its population or colonize new habitats its limited by the ability of seeds (or spores) to make it to a new location. Once there, nature takes its course and germination occurs with little impediment. If a plant is habitat limited, however, things get a bit more tricky. For habitat limited plants, simply getting seeds to a new location is not enough. Some other aspect of the environment (soil moisture, texture, temperature, disturbance, etc.) limit successful germination. Only when the right conditions are present can habitat limited plants germinate and begin to grow.

Habitat limitation is probably the most common limit to plant establishment. Simply put, not all plants will be successful everywhere. Even the successful growth and persistence of adult plants can be poor predictors of seedling success. Many plants can live for decades or even centuries and the conditions that were present when they germinated may have long since changed. Even the presence of the adults themselves can make a site unsuitable for germination. Think of all of those fire adapted species out there that require the entire community to burn before their seeds will ever germinate.

In reality, it is likely that most plants are habitat limited to some degree. These are not binary categories after all, rather they are aligned along a spectrum of possibilities. The fact that most plants don’t completely take over an area once seeds or spores arrive is proof of the myriad limits to plant establishment. As such, recruitment limitation is extremely important to study. It can make a huge difference in the context of conservation and restoration. Even the successful establishment of adult plants is no guarantee that seedlings stand a chance. Without successful recruitment, all you have left is a nice garden that is doomed to run its course. By understanding the limits to plant recruitment, we can do much more than just improve on our ability to protect and bolster plant populations, we can also gain insights into why so many plants remain rare on the landscape and so few ever rise to dominance.

Photo Credits: [1]

Further Reading: [1] [2]

Can Cultivation Save the Canary Island Lotuses?

Photo by VoDeTan2 Dericks-Tan licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License

Growing and propagating plants is, in my opinion, one of the most important skills humanity has ever developed. That is one of the reasons why I love gardening so much. Growing a plant allows you to strike up a close relationship with that species, which provides valuable insights into its biology. In today’s human-dominated world, it can also be an important step in preventing the extinction of some plants. Such may be the case for four unique legumes native to the Canary Islands provided it is done properly.

The Canary Islands are home to an impressive collection of plants in the genus Lotus, many of which are endemic. Four of those endemic Lotus species are at serious risk of extinction. Lotus berthelotii, L. eremiticus, L. maculatus, and L. pyranthus are endemic to only a few sites on this archipelago. Based on old records, it would appear that these four were never very common components of the island flora. Despite their rarity in the wild, at least one species, L. berthelotii, has been known to science since it was first described in 1881. The other three were described within the last 40 years after noting differences among plants being grown locally as ornamentals.

Photo by John Rusk licensed under CC BY 2.0

All four species look superficially similar to one another with their thin, silvery leaves and bright red to yellow flowers that do a great impression of a birds beak. The beak analogy seems apt for these flowers as evidence suggests that they are pollinated by birds. In the wild, they exhibit a creeping habit, growing over rocks and down overhangs. It is difficult to assess whether their current distributions truly reflect their ecological needs or if they are populations that are simply hanging on in sites that provide refugia from the myriad threats plaguing their survival.

None of these four Lotus species are doing well in the wild. Habitat destruction, the introduction of large herbivores like goats and cattle, as well as a change in the fire regime have seen alarming declines in their already small populations. Today, L. eremiticus and L. pyranthus are restricted to a handful of sites on the island of La Palma and L. berthelotii and L. maculatus are restricted to the island of Tenerife. In fact, L. berthelotii numbers have declined so dramatically that today it is considered nearly extinct in the wild.

Contrast this with their numbers in captivity. Whereas cultivation of L. eremiticus and L. pyranthus is largely restricted to island residents, L. berthelotii and L. maculatus and their hybrids can be found in nurseries all over the world. Far more plants exist in captivity than in their natural habitat. This fact has not been lost on conservationists working hard to ensure these plants have a future in the wild. However, simply having plants in captivity does not mean that the Canary Island Lotus are by any means safe.

One of the biggest issues facing any organism whose numbers have declined is that of reduced genetic diversity. Before plants from captivity can be used to augment wild populations, we need to know a thing or two about their genetic makeup. Because these Lotus can readily be rooted from cuttings, it is feared that most of the plants available in the nursery trade are simply clones of only a handful of individuals. Also, because hybrids are common and cross-pollination is always a possibility, conservationists fear that the individual genomes of each species may run the risk of being diluted by other species’ DNA.

Photo by VoDeTan2 Dericks-Tan licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License

Luckily for the Canary Island Lotus species, a fair amount of work is being done to not only protect the remaining wild plants, but also augment existing as well as establish new populations. To date, many of the remaining plants are found within the borders of protected areas of the island. Also, new areas are being identified as potential places where small populations or individuals may be hanging on, protected all this time by their inaccessibility. At the same time, each species has been seed banked and entered into cultivation programs in a handful of botanical gardens.

Still, one of the best means of ensuring these species can enjoy a continued existence in the wild is by encouraging their cultivation. Though hybrids have historically been popular with the locals, there are enough true species in cultivation that there is still reason for hope. Their ease of cultivation and propagation means that plants growing in peoples’ gardens can escape at least some of the pressures that they face in the wild. If done correctly, ex situ cultivation could offer a safe haven for these unique species until the Canary Islands can deal with the issues facing the remaining wild populations.

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Botanical Buoys

Photo by Doug McGrady licensed under CC BY 2.0

American featherfoil (Hottonia inflata) is a fascinating aquatic plant. It can be found in wetlands ranging from the coastal plains of Texas all the way up into Maine. Though widespread, American featherfoil is by no means common. Today I would like to introduce you to this gorgeous member of the primrose family (Primulaceae).

American featherfoil may look like a floating plant but it is not. It roots itself firmly into the soil and spends much of its early days as a vegetative stem covered in wonderful feathery leaves. It may be hard to find during this period as no part of it sticks above the water. To find it, one must look in shallow waters of ponds, ditches, and swamps that have not experienced too much disturbance. More on this in a bit.

Photo by Doug McGrady licensed under CC BY 2.0

American featherfoil lives life in the fast lane. It is what we call a winter annual. Seeds germinate in the fall and by late October, juveniles can be seen sporting a few leaves. There it will remains throughout the winter months until early spring when warming waters signal the growth phase. Such growth is rapid. So rapid, in fact, that by mid to late April, plants are beginning to flower. To successfully reproduce, however, American featherfoil must get its flowers above water.

The need to flower out of water is exactly why this plant looks like it is free floating. The flower stalks certainly do float and they do so via specialized stems, hence the specific epithet “inflata.” Each plant grows a series of large, spongy flowering stalks that are filled with air. This helps buoy the stems up above the water line. It does not float about very much as its stem and roots still anchor it firmly into place. Each inflorescence consists of a series of whorled umbels that vary in color from white to yellow, and even violet. Following pollination, seeds are released into the water where they settle into the mud and await the coming fall.

Photo by Doug McGrady licensed under CC BY 2.0

As I mentioned above, American featherfoil appreciates wetland habitats that haven’t experienced too much disturbance. Thanks to our wanton disregard for wetlands over the last century or so, American featherfoil (along with countless other species) has seen a decline in numbers. One of the biggest hits to this species came from the trapping of beavers. It turns out, beaver ponds offer some of the most ideal conditions for American featherfoil growth. Beaver ponds are relatively shallow and the water level does not change drastically from month to month.

Historically unsustainable levels of beaver trapping coupled with dam destruction, wetland draining, and agricultural runoff has removed so much suitable habitat and with it American featherfoil as well as numerous wetland constituents. Without habitat, species cannot persist. Because of this, American featherfoil has been placed on state threatened and endangered lists throughout the entirety of its range. With the return of the beaver to much of its former range, there is hope that at least some of the habitat will again be ready for American featherfoil. Still, our relationship with wetlands remains tenuous at best and until we do more to protect and restore such important ecosystems, species like American featherfoil will continue to suffer. This is why you must support wetland protection and restoration in your region!

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3]

Further Reading: [1] [2]

An Iris With Multiple Parents

The Abbeville iris (Iris nelsonii) is a very special plant. It is the rarest of the so-called “Louisiana Irises” and can only be found growing naturally in one small swamp in southern Louisiana. If you are lucky, you can catch it in flower during a few short weeks in spring. The blooms come in a range of colors from reddish-purple to nearly brown, an impressive sight to see siting atop tall, slender stems. However, the most incredible aspect of the biology of this species is its origin. The Abbeville iris is the result of hybridization between not two but three different iris species.

When I found out I would be heading to Louisiana in the spring of 2019, I made sure that seeing the Abbeville iris in person was near the top of my to-do list. How could a botany nut not want to see something so special? Iris nelsonii was only officially described as a species in 1966. Prior to that, many believed hybridization played a role in its origin. Multiple aspects of its anatomy appear intermediate between other native irises. It was not until proper molecular tests were done that the picture became clear.

The Abbeville iris genome contains bits and pieces of three other irises native to Louisiana. The most obvious parent was yet another red-flowering species - the copper iris (Iris fulva). It also contains DNA from the Dixie iris (Iris hexagona) and the zig-zag iris (Iris brevicaulis). If you had a similar childhood as I did, then you may have learned in grade school biology class that hybrids are usually biological dead ends. They may exhibit lots of beneficial traits but, like mules, they are often sterile. Certainly this is often the case, especially for hybrid animals, however, more and more we are finding that hybridization has resulted in multiple legitimate speciation events, especially in plants.

Iris fulva. Photo by Richard licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Iris hexagona. Photo by beautifulcataya licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Iris brevicaulis. Photo by peganum licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

How exactly three species of iris managed to “come together” and produce a functional species like I. nelsonii is interesting to ponder. Each of its three parent species prefers a different sort of habitat than the others. For instance, the copper iris is most often found in seasonally wet, shady bottomland hardwood forests as well as the occasional roadside ditch, whereas the Dixie iris is said to prefer more open habitats like wet prairies. In a few very specific locations, however, these types of habitats can be found within relatively short distances of each other.

Apparently at some point in the past, a few populations swapped pollen and the eventual result was a stable hybrid that would some day be named Iris nelsonii. As mentioned, this is a rare plant. Until it was introduced to other sites to ensure its ongoing existence in the wild, the Abbeville iris was only known to occur in any significant numbers at one single locality. This necessitates the question as to whether or not this “species” is truly unique in its ecology to warrant that status. It could very well be that that single locality just happens to produce a lot of one off hybrids.

In reality, the Abbeville iris does seem to “behave” differently from any of its parental stock. For starters, it seems to perform best in habitats that are intermediate of its parental species. This alone has managed to isolate it enough to keep the Abbeville from being reabsorbed genetically by subsequent back-crossing with its parents. Another mechanism of isolation has to do with its pollinators. The Abbeville iris is intermediate in its floral morphology as well, which means that pollen placement may not readily occur when pollinators visit different iris species in succession. Also, being largely red in coloration, the Abbeville iris receives a lot of attention from hummingbirds.

Although hummingbirds do not appear to show an initial preference when given the option to visit copper and Abbeville irises at a given location, research has found that once hummingbirds visit an Abbeville iris flower, they tend to stick to that species provided enough flowers are available. As such, the Abbeville iris likely gets the bulk of the attention from local hummingbirds while it is in bloom, ensuring that its pollen is being delivered to members of its own species and not any of its progenitors. For all intents and purposes, it would appear that this hybrid iris is behaving much like a true species.

As with any rare plant, its ongoing survival in the wild is always cause for concern. Certainly Louisiana is no stranger to habitat loss and an ever-increasing human population coupled with climate change are ongoing threats to the Abbeville iris. Changes in the natural hydrologic cycle of its swampy habitat appear to have already caused a shift in its distribution. Whereas it historically could be found in abundance in the interior of the swamp, reductions in water levels have seen it move out of the swamp and into ditches where water levels remain a bit more stable year round. Also, if its habitat were to become more fragmented, the reproductive barriers that have maintained this unique species may degrade to the point in which it is absorbed back into an unstable hybrid mix with one or a couple of its parent species. Luckily for the Abbeville, offspring have been planted into at least one other location, which helps to reduce the likelihood of extinction due to a single isolated event.

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

The Creeping Fuchsia

Photo by James Gaither licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Meet Fuchsia procumbens aka the creeping Fuchsia. This lovely plant is endemic to New Zealand where, sadly, it is threatened. In its native habitat, it is strictly a coastal species, prefering to grow in sandy soils. The  flowers are quite unlike most other members of the genus Fuchshia and they exhibit an interesting flowering strategy. 

Fuchsia procumbens produces 3 distinct flower forms, flowers with only  working male parts, flowers with only working female parts, and hermaphroditic flowers. One reason for this is to avoid self-pollination. The other reason may have something to do with energy costs. When growing conditions are less than stellar, the plant saves energy by producing male flowers. 

Photo by Martin Reith licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

Pollen is relatively cheap after all. When conditions improve, the plant may allocate more resources to female and hermaphroditic flowers. This strategy worries some botanists because it seems like some populations of F. procumbens only ever produce single sex flowers. After pollination, the flowers give way to bright red berries that are larger than the flowers themselves!

The most interesting thing about this species is, despite its apparent specificity in habitat preferences in the wild, it competes well with aggressive grasses, which has made it a very popular ground cover. As it turns out, its growing popularity in the garden trade may save this species from being placed on the endangered species list.

Photo Credits: [1] [2]

Further Reading: [1] [2]

The Smallest of the Giants

Photo by Edwino S. Fernando [source]

There are a lot of cool ways to discover a new species but what about tripping over one? That is exactly how Rafflesia consueloae was found. Researchers from the University of the Philippines Los Baños were walking through the forest back in 2014 when one of them tripped over something. To their surprise, it was the bloom of a strange parasitic plant.

This was an exciting discovery because it meant that that strange family of holoparasitic plants called Rafflesiaceae just got a little bit bigger. Rafflesiaceae is famous the world over for the size of its flowers. Whereas the main body of plants in this family consists of tiny thread-like structures living within the tissues of forest vines, the flowers of many are huge. In fact, with a flower 3 feet (1 meter) in diameter, which can weigh as much as 24 lbs. (11 kg), Rafflesia arnoldii  produces the largest flower on the planet. This new species of Rafflesia, however, is a bit of a shrimp compared to its cousins.

In fact, R. consueloae produces the smallest flowers of the genus. Of the individuals that have been found, the largest flower clocked in at 3.83 inches (9.37 cm) in diameter. Needless to say, this was an exciting discovery and those responsible for it quickly set about observing the plant in detail. Cameras were set up to monitor flower development as well as to keep track of any animals that might pay it a visit. It turns out that, like its cousins, R. consueloae appears to be a specialist parasite on a group of vines in the genus Tetrastigma.

One of the unique characteristics of R. consueloae, other than its size, is the fact that its flowers don’t seem to produce any noticeable scent. This is a bit odd considering that its cousins are frequently referred to as “corpse flowers” thanks to the fact that they both look and smell like rotting meat. That is not to say that this species produces no scent at all. In fact, researchers noted that the fruits of R. consueloae smell a bit like coconut.

Its discoverers were quick to note that the discovery of such a strange parasitic plant in this particular stretch of forest is exciting because of the state of disrepair the forest is in. This region has suffered heavily from deforestation and fragmentation and it has long been thought that such specialized parasites like those in the genus Rafflesia could not persist after logging. As such, this discovery offers at least some hope that they may not be as sensitive as we once thought. Still, that does not mean that R. consueloae is by any means secure in its future.

To date, R. consueloae has only been found growing in two localities in Pantabangan, Phillippines. Though it is possible that more populations will be found growing elsewhere, its limited distribution nonetheless places it at high risk for extinction. Further habitat loss and the potential for anthropogenic forest fires are considerable threats to these plants and the hosts they simply can’t live without.

Despite plenty of observation, no one is quite sure how this species manages to reproduce successfully. Individual flowers are said to be either male or female but without a scent, its hard to say who or what pollinates them. Similarly, it still remains a mystery as to how R. consueloae (or any of its relatives for that matter) accomplish seed dispersal. Some small mammals were seen feeding on fruits but what happens after that is anyone’s guess. It seems like the various Rafflesiaceae still have many mysteries to be solved.

Photo Credit: [1]

Further Reading: [1]

Maxipiñon: One of the Rarest Pines in the World

Photo by Ruff tuff cream puff licensed under public domain

The maxipiñon (Pinus maximartinezii) is one of the rarest pines on Earth. A native of southern Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico, nearly all individuals of this species can be found scattered over an area that collectively spans only about 3 to 6 square miles (5 – 10 km²) in size. Needless to say, the maxipiñon teeters on the brink of extinction. As a result, a lot of effort has been put forward to better understand this species and to develop plans aimed at ensuring it is not lost forever.

The maxipiñon has only been known to science for a few decades. It was described back in 1964 after botanist Jerzy Rzedowski noted some exceptionally large pine seeds for sale at a local market. He named the species in honor of Maximino Martínez, who contributed greatly to our understanding of Mexican conifers. However, it was very obvious that the maxipiñon was well known among the residents of Zacatecas.

The reason for this are its seeds. The maxipiñon is said to produce the largest and most nutritious seeds of all the pines. As such, it is a staple of the regional diet. Conversations with local farmers suggest that it was much more common as recent as 60 years ago. Since then, its numbers have been greatly reduced. It soon became apparent that in order to save this species, we had to learn a lot more about what threatens its survival.

The most obvious place to start was recruitment. If any species is to survive, reproduction must outpace death. A survey of local markets revealed that a lot of maxipiñon seeds were being harvest from the wild. This would be fine if maxipiñon were widespread but this is not the case. Over-harvesting of seeds could spell disaster for a species with such small population sizes.

Indeed, surveys of wild maxipiñon revealed there to be only 2,000 to 2,500 mature individuals and almost no seedlings. However, mature trees do produce a considerable amount of cones. Therefore, the conclusion was made that seed harvesting may be the single largest threat to this tree. Subsequent research has suggested that seed harvests actually may not be the cause of its rarity. It turns out, maxipiñon population growth appears to be rather insensitive to the number of seeds produced each year. Instead, juvenile tree survival seems to form the biggest bottleneck to population growth.

Photo by Krzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

You see, this tree appears to be more limited by suitable germination sites than it does seed numbers. It doesn’t matter if thousands of seeds are produced if very few of them ever find a good spot to grow. Because of this, scientists feel that there are other more serious threats to the maxipiñon than seed harvesting. However, humans are still not off the hook. Other human activities proved to be far more damaging.

About 50 years ago, big changes were made to local farming practices. More and more land was being cleared for cattle grazing. Much of that clearing was done by purposefully setting fires. The bark of the maxipiñon is very thin, which makes it highly susceptible to fire. As fires burn through its habitat, many trees are killed. Those that survive must then contend with relentless overgrazing by cattle. If that wasn’t enough, the cleared land also becomes highly eroded, thus further reducing its suitability for maxipiñon regeneration. Taken together, these are the biggest threats to the ongoing survival of this pine. Its highly fragmented habitat no longer offers suitable sites for seedling growth and survival.

As with any species this rare, issues of genetic diversity also come into play. Though molecular analyses have shown that maxipiñon does not currently suffer from inbreeding, it has revealed some interesting data that give us hints into the deeper history of this species. Written in maxipiñon DNA is evidence of an extreme population bottleneck that occurred somewhere between 400 and 1000 years ago. It appears that this is not the first time this tree has undergone population decline.

There are a few ways in which these data can be interpreted. One is that the maxipiñon evolved relatively recently from a small number of unique and isolated individuals. Perhaps a hybridization event occurred between two closely related piñon species - the weeping piñon (Pinus pinceana) and Nelson piñon (Pinus nelsonii). Another possibility, which does not rule out hybridization, is that the maxipiñon may actually be the result of artificial selection by agriculturists of the region. Considering the value of its seeds today, it is not hard to imagine farmers selecting and breeding piñon for larger seeds. It goes without saying that these claims are largely unsubstantiated and would require much more evidence to say with any certainty, however, there is plenty of evidence that civilizations like the Mayans were conserving and propagation useful tree species much earlier than this.

Despite all we have learned about the maxipiñon over the last few decades, the fate of this tree is far from secure. Ex situ conservation efforts are well underway and you can now see maxipiñon specimens growing in arboreta and botanical gardens around the world. Seeds from these populations are being used for storage and to propagate more trees. Sadly, until something is done to protect the habitat on which it relies, there is no telling how long this species will last in the wild. This is why habitat conservation efforts are so important. Please support local land conservation efforts in your area because the maxipiñon is but one species facing the loss of its habitat.

Photo Credits: [1] [2] [3] [4]

Further Reading [1] [2] [3]

Gooey Pitcher Fluids

Photo by Shawn Mayes licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

There seems to be no end to the diversity of colors, shapes, and sizes exhibited by Nepenthes and their pitchers. These wonderful carnivorous plants grow these pitchers as a means of supplementing their nutritional needs as the habitats in which Nepenthes are found are lacking in vital nutrients like nitrogen. There are as many variations on the pitcher theme as there are Nepenthes but all function as traps in one form or another. How they trap insects is another topic entirely and some species have evolved incredible means of making sure prey does not escape. Some of my favorites belong to those species that employ sticky mucilage.

Arguably one of the most iconic of this type is Nepenthes inermis. This species is endemic to a small region of Sumatra and, to date, has only been found growing on a handful of mountain peaks in the western part of the country. The specific epithet ‘inermis’ is Latin for ‘unarmed’ as was given in reference to the bizarre upper pitchers of this plant. They look more like toilet bowls than anything carnivorous and indeed, they lack many of the features characteristic of other Nepenthes pitchers such as a peristome and a slippery, waxy coating on the inside of the pitcher walls.

Photo by Alfindra Primaldhi licensed under CC BY 2.0

These may seem like minor details but consider the role these features play in other Nepenthes. A peristome is essentially a brightly colored, slippery lip that lines the outer rim of the pitcher mouth. Not only does this serve in attracting insect prey, it also aids in their capture. As mentioned, the peristome can be extremely slippery (especially when wet) so that any insect stumbling around on the rim is much more likely to fall in. Once inside, a waxy coating on the inside of some pitchers aids in keeping insects down. They simply cannot get purchase on the waxy walls and therefore cannot climb back out. So, for N. inermis to lack both features is a bit strange.

Another interesting feature of N. inermis pitchers is the highly reduced pitcher lid. It hasn’t disappeared completely but compared with other Nepenthes, this pitcher lid barely registers as one. For most Nepenthes, pitcher lids serve multiple functions. For starters, they keep the rain out. Nepenthes are most at home in humid, tropical climates where rain is a daily force to be reckoned with. For many Nepenthes, rain not only dilutes the valuable digestive soup brewing within each pitcher, it can also cause them to overflow and dump their nutritious contents. Pitcher lids can also help in attracting prey. Like the peristome, they are often brightly colored but many also secrete nectar, which insects find irresistible. Lured in by the promise of food, some insects inevitably fall down into the pitcher below.

Looking into the pitcher of Nepenthes inermis. Photo by Shawn Mayes licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

Considering the importance of such structures, it becomes a little bit confusing why some Nepenthes have evolved away from this anatomy. The question then remains, why would a species like N. inermis no longer produce pitchers with these features? Amazingly, the answer actually lies within the pitcher fluid itself.

Tip over the upper pitchers of N. inermis and you will soon discover that they are filled with an extremely viscous mucilage. It is so viscous that some have reported that when the pitchers are held upside down, the mucilage within can form an unbroken stream of considerable length. Its the viscosity of this fluid that is the real reason that N. inermis is able to capture prey so easily. Insects lured to the traps can catch a drink of the nectar on the tiny lid. In doing so, some inevitably fall down into the pitcher itself.

The upper pitcher of the closely related Nepenthes dubia. Photo by Alfindra Primaldhi licensed under CC BY 2.0

Instead of slippery walls or downward pointing hairs keeping the insects in, the viscous pitcher fluid quickly engulfs the struggling prey. Some have even suggested that the nectar secreted by the tiny lid has narcotic effects on visiting insects, however, I have not seen any data demonstrating this. Once caught in the fluid, insects easily slide their way down into the depths of the pitcher where they can be digested. This is probably why the pitchers are shaped like tiny toilet bowls; their shape allows for a large sticky surface area for insects to get stuck while prey that has already been captured is funneled down to where digestion and absorption takes place. In a way, these types of pitchers behave surprisngly similar to the sticky traps utilized by other carnivorous plants like sundews (Drosera spp.).

The viscous fluid also comes in handy during the frequent rains that blanket these mountains. As mentioned above, rain would quickly dilute most pitcher fluids but not when the pitcher fluid itself is more dense. Water sits on top of the viscous mucilage and when the pitchers become too heavy, they tip over. The water readily pours out but little if any of the pitcher fluid is lost in the process. It seems that species like N. inermis no longer fight the elements but rather have adapted to meet them head on. As such, they no longer have a need for a large pitcher lid.

Nepenthes jamban takes the toilet bowl shape to the extreme. Photo by Alfindra Primaldhi licensed under CC BY 3.0

Nepenthes inermis is not alone in having evolved pitchers like this. Viscous pitcher mucilage is a trait shared by its closest relatives - N. dubia, N. flava, N. jacquelineae, N. jamban, N. talangensis, and N. tenuis, as well as even more distantly related species such as N. rafflesiana. Because prey capture is so important for the fitness of individuals, it is no wonder that so many different forms have evolved within this genus. In fact, many experts believe that variations in the way in which prey is captured and utilized is one of the main reasons why Nepenthes have undergone such a dramatic adaptive radiation.

Sadly, the uniqueness in form and function of these pitchers has landed many of these species on the endangered species list. As if habitat destruction wasn’t already pushing some to the brink, species like N. inermis are being poached at alarmingly unsustainable rates. Due to their limited distributions, most populations simply cannot recover from even moderate levels of harvesting. The silver lining in all of this is that many Nepenthes are extremely easy to grow and propagate provided their basic needs are met. As more and more folks enter into the carnivorous plant hobby, hopefully more and more people will be sharing seeds, cuttings, and tissue cultured materials. In doing so, we can hopefully reduce some of the pressures placed on wild populations.

Photos via Wikimedia Commons

Further Reading: [1] [2] [3]